fbpx

Commonwealth spends more than $7.6 million in prosecuting whistleblowers including Bernard Collaery, David McBride and Richard Boyle

Henri Scott

July 9, 2023

Share This:

Original Source: ABC News, Matthew Doran

The Commonwealth spent $233,171 prosecuting Richard Boyle’s case. 

The Commonwealth has racked up more than $7.6 million in legal fees pursuing whistleblowers, with the bulk of that bill relating to a now-dumped prosecution. 

Officials from the Attorney-General’s Department revealed the cost under questioning from New South Wales Greens senator David Shoebridge, who labelled it as a “lavish use of taxpayer funds”.

In July last year, Federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus ordered prosecutors to drop the case against Canberra lawyer Bernard Collaery.

Mr Collaery had been charged with helping his client, an ex-spy known by the pseudonym “Witness K” with revealing classified details of a secret mission in Timor Leste.

The Attorney-General’s Department confirmed that by the end of January, the case against Mr Collaery and Witness K had cost the Commonwealth $5,510,829.

Bernard Collaery was charged in 2018 with helping his client, an ex-spy known only as Witness K, to reveal details of an alleged Australian spying operation in East Timor. (ABC Radio Canberra: Clarissa Thorpe)

Senator Shoebridge also sought details of prosecutions against David McBride and Richard Boyle.

Mr McBride is being prosecuted for allegedly leaking top-secret defence information to the ABC, while Mr Boyle is before the courts after lifting the lid on unethical debt recovery practices within the Australian Taxation Office.

David Mr McBride, a former military lawyer, spoke up about alleged war crimes committed by Australian forces in Afghanistan.(John Gunn, ABC News.)

Officials revealed the cost of the McBride prosecution had reached $1,875,348, while Mr Boyle’s case had reached $233,171.

The Commonwealth’s spending in Mr McBride’s case was higher, according to Attorney-General’s Department officials, because of the extra work needed to protect national security information.

Senator Shoebridge described it as using taxpayer funds for “monstering whistleblowers”.

“Is there some point at which … your department reviews the lavish use of public money to jail a whistleblower,” he asked.

“I’m not sure I would agree with your characterisation of lavish, it’s a significant amount of money,” Attorney-General Department Secretary Katherine Jones responded.

The Department’s deputy secretary, Sarah Chidgey, noted it was up to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, as an independent agency, to decide whether to continue pursuing the two men.

“They continue over time to have regard to the prosecution policy of the Commonwealth, and whether it continues to be satisfied — and that includes consideration of the public interest,” Ms Chidgey said.

The federal government has been criticised for pursuing Mr McBride and Mr Boyle by whistleblowing advocates, particularly as it reviews Commonwealth whistleblowing protections.

Share This:

Written By Henri Scott

    Follow Us

    Like Our Facebook

    Related Articles

    Leave A Comment

    0 Comments

    Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Shares
    Share This